Posts
The ABCs of Supervising: What Kindergarten Teachers Know That CEOs Don't
Related Reading:
The best supervisor I ever worked under was my mate's wife, Sarah, who ran a childcare centre in Footscray. Never worked in corporate. Never had an MBA. But watching her wrangle 23 five-year-olds while keeping three staff members motivated, organised, and somehow still speaking to each other by afternoon tea? That woman understood supervision better than half the executives I've trained in my 18 years as a workplace consultant.
Most business leaders think supervising is about authority, KPIs, and the occasional performance review. They're missing the point entirely.
The Foundation Block Principle
Here's what Sarah taught me without meaning to: every good supervisor is essentially a kindergarten teacher with a bigger budget. You're dealing with the same fundamental challenges - attention spans, emotional regulation, conflict resolution, and the constant need to redirect energy toward productive outcomes.
The difference? Kids are honest about when they don't understand something.
In my experience working across Melbourne, Sydney, and Perth, I've noticed that the most effective supervisors treat their teams like Sarah treated her classroom. Clear expectations. Consistent routines. Immediate feedback. And crucially - they never assume someone knows how to do something just because they're an adult with a university degree.
Telstra figured this out years ago with their customer service training. Instead of throwing new employees into complex systems, they broke everything down into digestible chunks. Like teaching alphabet blocks before expecting someone to write poetry. Revolutionary stuff, apparently.
Why Most Supervision Training Gets It Wrong
The traditional approach to supervisory training focuses on management theory and leadership frameworks. Academic stuff that looks impressive on certificates but falls apart the moment someone has a meltdown in the break room because the coffee machine's broken and they're dealing with a difficult customer.
Sarah's approach was different. She understood that 80% of supervision is about emotional intelligence and practical problem-solving. The other 20%? That's where the business knowledge comes in.
I've seen this play out hundreds of times in workshops across Australia. Give someone all the theory in the world about delegation and communication styles, but if they can't read the room when their team member walks in Monday morning looking like they've been hit by a truck, none of that theory matters.
Here's the thing though - and this might ruffle some feathers - most supervisors are promoted because they're good at their job, not because they're good at managing people. It's like promoting the best footballer to coach. Different skill set entirely.
The Three Non-Negotiables
After watching Sarah in action and then spending years trying to replicate her success in corporate environments, I've identified three core principles that separate exceptional supervisors from the merely adequate ones:
Clear Communication Without the Corporate Speak. Sarah never said "let's circle back to touch base on this moving forward." She said "we'll talk about this after lunch." Direct. Simple. No room for misinterpretation. Yet I've sat through countless meetings where managers use so much business jargon that nobody knows what they're actually supposed to do.
Consistency in Everything. Kids thrive on routine, and so do adults. Sarah had the same expectations every day, the same consequences for the same behaviours, and the same rewards for good work. No favourites, no mood-dependent management styles. Compare that to supervisors who change the rules based on whether they've had their morning coffee or if head office is breathing down their necks.
Immediate Recognition and Correction. When a child in Sarah's class did something well, they knew about it within seconds. Same with mistakes. No waiting for quarterly reviews or annual performance discussions. Real-time feedback that actually helps people improve rather than formal documentation exercises that help nobody.
The construction industry in Queensland has really embraced this approach lately. Site supervisors who treat their crews like Sarah treated her kids - clear instructions, immediate feedback, consistent expectations - are seeing significant improvements in both safety records and productivity. Makes sense when you think about it.
The Emotional Regulation Factor
This is where it gets interesting, and where most business training completely misses the mark. Sarah spent half her day helping kids manage their emotions. Teaching them how to express frustration appropriately, how to share resources, how to resolve conflicts without hitting each other.
Sound familiar?
Yet somehow we expect adults to magically know how to handle workplace stress, difficult colleagues, and competing priorities without any guidance. Then we're surprised when teams fall apart under pressure or when office politics become toxic.
I remember working with a manufacturing plant outside Adelaide where the floor supervisor - let's call him Dave - was having constant issues with his team. High turnover, frequent arguments, low morale. Dave was technically brilliant, knew every machine inside out, but he had zero clue how to help his team work through problems.
We spent three months essentially teaching Dave kindergarten teacher skills. How to recognise when someone was struggling before they exploded. How to facilitate conversations between team members who weren't getting along. How to celebrate small wins and redirect negative energy.
The transformation was remarkable. Same people, same workload, completely different atmosphere. Dave later told me it was like finally having the right tools for the job.
The Recognition Reality Check
Here's something that'll probably annoy some people: most supervisors are terrible at recognition. Not because they don't care, but because they overthink it.
Sarah understood that recognition works best when it's specific, immediate, and public. "Great job helping Tommy with his puzzle, Emma. That was really kind." Simple. Effective. No formal recognition programs or employee-of-the-month schemes required.
In corporate Australia, we've turned recognition into this complex process involving nomination forms, approval chains, and quarterly ceremonies. By the time someone gets recognised for good work, they've forgotten what they did and moved on to three other projects.
Woolworths actually gets this right in many of their stores. Floor supervisors who acknowledge good customer service in the moment, right in front of other team members. No paperwork, no formal process, just immediate appreciation for work well done.
The research backs this up too - 67% of employees say they'd prefer immediate recognition over formal rewards. Yet most organisations still persist with annual awards ceremonies and generic thank-you emails sent weeks after the fact.
When Traditional Management Fails
The kindergarten approach isn't just about being nice to people. It's about understanding that human behaviour is predictable and manageable when you have the right framework.
Sarah dealt with tantrums by staying calm, setting clear boundaries, and helping kids understand the consequences of their choices. She never took behaviour personally, never got drawn into power struggles, and always focused on solutions rather than blame.
Compare that to supervisors who react emotionally to team conflicts, take performance issues as personal attacks on their leadership, or get caught up in office drama instead of addressing the underlying problems.
I've worked with teams where the supervisor was technically competent but emotionally reactive. Every small issue became a crisis. Every disagreement became a confrontation. Teams walking on eggshells, productivity suffering, good people leaving for calmer environments.
The solution isn't sensitivity training or communication workshops. It's teaching supervisors the same emotional regulation skills that kindergarten teachers use every day.
The Learning Environment Factor
Sarah's classroom was set up for success. Clear routines, accessible resources, designated spaces for different activities. Most importantly, mistakes were treated as learning opportunities rather than failures.
Most workplaces are the opposite. Unclear processes, resources that require three approvals to access, and a culture where making mistakes feels like career suicide.
Effective supervision creates an environment where people can experiment, learn, and grow without fear of punishment for honest mistakes. Yet I regularly encounter supervisors who think their job is to catch people doing things wrong rather than helping them do things right.
The mining industry in Western Australia has been particularly good at adopting this mindset. Safety-critical environments where mistakes can have serious consequences, but the best supervisors focus on creating systems that prevent errors rather than punishing people after the fact.
The Practical Application
So how do you actually implement kindergarten teacher supervision in a business environment? It's simpler than most people think, but it requires supervisors to let go of some traditional management habits.
Start with the basics: clear expectations communicated simply. No corporate jargon, no assumptions about prior knowledge. If you wouldn't explain it that way to a five-year-old, you're probably overcomplicating it.
Establish consistent routines for team communication, problem-solving, and decision-making. People need to know what to expect and when. Uncertainty creates anxiety, anxiety reduces performance.
Implement immediate feedback systems. Not formal reviews, just regular check-ins and real-time course corrections. Most problems are easily solved when they're small, but become major issues when left to fester.
Create a learning-focused culture where mistakes are discussed openly and solutions are developed collaboratively. This is harder than it sounds because it requires supervisors to model vulnerability and admit their own learning opportunities.
The Bottom Line
The best supervisors I've worked with over the years all share one characteristic: they understand that their job is to help people succeed, not to catch them failing. They create environments where teams can do their best work, and they intervene early when problems arise.
They're essentially kindergarten teachers with profit-and-loss responsibility.
The business world could learn a lot from Sarah and others like her. Less focus on management theory, more attention to practical people skills. Less hierarchy, more collaboration. Less formal process, more human connection.
Because at the end of the day, whether you're managing five-year-olds or fifty-year-olds, the fundamentals remain the same: clear expectations, consistent support, and the wisdom to know that everyone's just trying to do their best with the tools they've been given.
Most organisations just need better supervisors to help them use those tools more effectively.
Further Reading: